uncovering and quantifying social bias
Appendix Uncovering and Quantifying Social Biases in Code Generation
We conduct a preliminary study on finding a proper prompt construction strategy. Further research can utilize our analysis to construct more powerful code prompts. Table 1: Code prompt study results of CBS. N" means there are one human-relevant function Table 2: Automatic and human evaluation results of social biases in the generated code on GPT -4. We also conduct experiments on GPT -4.
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.71)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Chatbot (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Automatic Programming (0.45)
Uncovering and Quantifying Social Biases in Code Generation
With the popularity of automatic code generation tools, such as Copilot, the study of the potential hazards of these tools is gaining importance. In this work, we explore the social bias problem in pre-trained code generation models. We propose a new paradigm to construct code prompts and successfully uncover social biases in code generation models. To quantify the severity of social biases in generated code, we develop a dataset along with three metrics to evaluate the overall social bias and fine-grained unfairness across different demographics. Experimental results on three pre-trained code generation models (Codex, InCoder, and CodeGen) with varying sizes, reveal severe social biases. Moreover, we conduct analysis to provide useful insights for further choice of code generation models with low social bias.
Appendix Uncovering and Quantifying Social Biases in Code Generation
We conduct a preliminary study on finding a proper prompt construction strategy. Further research can utilize our analysis to construct more powerful code prompts. Table 1: Code prompt study results of CBS. N" means there are one human-relevant function Table 2: Automatic and human evaluation results of social biases in the generated code on GPT -4. We also conduct experiments on GPT -4.
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.71)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Chatbot (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Automatic Programming (0.45)
Uncovering and Quantifying Social Biases in Code Generation
With the popularity of automatic code generation tools, such as Copilot, the study of the potential hazards of these tools is gaining importance. In this work, we explore the social bias problem in pre-trained code generation models. We propose a new paradigm to construct code prompts and successfully uncover social biases in code generation models. To quantify the severity of social biases in generated code, we develop a dataset along with three metrics to evaluate the overall social bias and fine-grained unfairness across different demographics. Experimental results on three pre-trained code generation models (Codex, InCoder, and CodeGen) with varying sizes, reveal severe social biases.